Applicability and entity status
We determine whether and from when you are subject to the AML package and whether you operate as an existing entity or one newly covered by the regulation.
We guide companies from applicability diagnosis to full AMLR readiness, GIIF inspections and AMLA supervision, with a practical 0-9 stage roadmap.
We translate AMLR, AMLD6, AMLA and Travel Rule requirements into operational actions that can be implemented across business, compliance and IT teams.
We determine whether and from when you are subject to the AML package and whether you operate as an existing entity or one newly covered by the regulation.
We design a Compliance Manager + Compliance Officer model, role split, independent audit and board reporting.
We implement due diligence procedures, UBO >=25% verification, PEP/HNWI, source of funds and ongoing CDD reviews.
We build transaction monitoring, sanctions screening, the STR path and a procedure for FIU responses within 5 business days.
We align processes with the CDD threshold >EUR 10,000, cash >=EUR 3,000, cash limit >EUR 10,000 and the ban on anonymous instruments.
We prepare documentation, an evidence pack and processes for national inspections and potential direct AMLA supervision.
We support both entities already covered by AML and sectors that are broadly entering the new AMLR regime.
Banks, payment institutions, EMIs, investment firms, funds and life insurers.
Entities with the dual MiCA + AMLR + TFR regime, including self-hosted wallet mitigation.
Sales and rental intermediaries, including rentals above EUR 10,000 per month.
Jewellery >EUR 10k, cars >EUR 250k, yachts/aircraft >EUR 7.5 million, art >EUR 10k.
Law firms, notaries, statutory auditors, accountants and tax advisors.
Crowdfunding platforms, credit intermediaries, investment migration and, from 2029, professional football.
AML risk is not only a financial penalty. It is also licensing risk, reputational risk and management liability for the lack of an effective system.
Serious breaches: up to EUR 10 million or 10% of annual turnover. For natural persons: up to EUR 5 million.
A new liability model: a Compliance Manager at board level and tangible supervisory consequences for gaps in the system.
Errors in CDD/EDD, UBO, STR or sanctions screening can block business processes and increase exposure to inspections.
Breaches may result in additional sanctions: licence withdrawal, ban on management functions, intervention measures.
Legal status/material: 21 February 2026.
Questions most frequently raised at board, compliance and operations level during AMLR preparation.
No. The scope also covers new sectors, including parts of the real estate industry, luxury goods, crowdfunding and other industries indicated in the EU AML package.
The Compliance Manager is responsible at management level for the effectiveness of the AML system, while the Compliance Officer handles operational maintenance of the process and controls.
In particular, for business relationships, occasional transactions above EUR 10,000, cash from EUR 3,000, ML/TF suspicion and doubts about customer data.
The threshold is defined as at least 25%, multi-tier structure verification is gaining importance, and there is an obligation to report discrepancies with the register.
No. The STR decision and responsibility for filing remain with the organisation as an internal function.
In the target AML package model we are talking about 5 business days, so a ready escalation and data-flow procedure is essential.
For many organisations a single cross-compliance model works better than several parallel projects, especially for CASPs and financial entities.
The scope depends on the organisation's maturity. Most often the project covers a diagnostic stage, procedure redesign, training and preparation of an ongoing maintenance model.
Yes, if it is an obliged entity. The scope of measures is proportionate to risk, but core obligations remain mandatory.
We build the training programme around roles and the operational risk of each organisation. We deliver training at the client's premises, on-site at our offices or online.
We come to you. On-site training tailored to the team and the specifics of your organisation.
Welcome to the Legal Geek office. Ideal for teams from different organisations participating together.
Live training via video conference. Full interactivity, Q&A and materials in electronic form.
We tailor the programme and topical scope to the risk profile and specifics of your business — there are no template "one-size-fits-all" trainings.
We deliver complete documentation: a training register, attendance confirmations and training materials for the compliance file.
At the end of each training we run a knowledge test. The participant receives a certificate confirming AML competencies.
Sample agenda — AML training for the Compliance team (16h)
We also offer e-learning modules available 24/7 — as a supplement to expert-led training. The platform includes, among others:
Each module ends with a test. The compliance manager receives a completion report and participant certificates.
According to the position of the Office of the Polish Financial Supervision Authority: self-study does not satisfy the training obligation set out in Article 52 of the Anti-Money Laundering Act for the AML Officer. It may only supplement professional training delivered by qualified trainers.
Stage outcome: AML Training Program + materials + training register + attendance confirmations.
We build procedures that pass the practical test: clear allocation of responsibilities, complete documentation and operational performance in day-to-day processes.
We design procedures for the new thresholds and scenarios: PEP, HNWI, high-risk countries, source of funds/source of wealth.
We implement look-through ownership, UBO >=25% verification and a procedure for reporting register discrepancies.
We automate EU/UN/OFAC screening, the hit process and asset freezing, and sanctions list updates.
We define the suspicion reporting path, the tipping-off prohibition and a procedure for responding to FIU requests within 5 business days.
We implement cash limit controls and identification requirements for payments in line with the new AMLR regime.
We structure outsourcing with a clear separation of functions that cannot be transferred outside the organisation (including STR).
We close the implementation with a continuous model: audit, regulatory change monitoring and readiness for national inspections and AMLA.
We test the quality of CDD/EDD, STR, screening and alert logic, and turn the results into a remediation plan with owners.
We update the risk assessment, report quarterly to the board and maintain a calendar of AML obligations.
We build the evidence pack and processes for inspection, including a readiness assessment for cross-border entities.
Stage outcome: Annual AML Audit Report + AMLA Readiness Assessment + Regulatory Watch Calendar.
In AML we combine legal, regulatory and technology perspectives so that implementations are secure and operationally feasible.
Managing Partner
FinTech navigator. Lawyer.
Cut-off dates determine the budget, sequence of actions and urgency of implementation.
TFR active: obligation to provide originator/beneficiary data for transfers of funds and crypto-assets.
AMLA begins operations and builds the European supervisory model.
Next stage of AMLD6 transposition and finalisation of some implementing standards.
Key deadline: full entry into force of AMLR (Single Rulebook) and the new sanctions regime.
AML obligations enter into force for professional clubs and football agents.
Legal status/material: 21 February 2026.
We close each stage with a concrete artefact that can be used in audits, inspections and board reporting.
We assess whether the organisation is an obliged entity and what regulatory roles it performs.
AML Applicability Assessment + Obliged Entity Classification
We build a Business-Wide AML/CFT Risk Assessment and a client/product/channel/jurisdiction risk matrix.
Business-Wide Risk Assessment + Risk Matrix
We implement the compliance manager/officer model, AML/CFT policies, whistleblowing and outsourcing rules.
AML Governance Framework + Policy Pack
We design a full due diligence process covering UBO, PEP and HNWI as well as a review of existing clients.
CDD/EDD/SDD Procedures + UBO/PEP Framework
We build transaction monitoring, alert handling, STR/SAR, sanctions screening and FIU responses.
TM Policy + STR Procedure + FIU Response Procedure
We strengthen the UBO identification process and the reporting of register discrepancies.
UBO Verification Procedure + Discrepancy Reporting
We implement cash limit controls, the identification process and the elimination of anonymous instruments.
Cash Limit Procedure + Anonymous Instrument Policy
We combine AML with MiCA, DORA, GDPR, AI Act and NIS2 in a single operating model.
Cross-Regulatory Alignment Matrix
We launch role-based training and a training register with confirmations.
AML Training Program + Training Register
We close the continuous model: annual audit, change monitoring and inspection readiness.
Annual AML Audit Report + AMLA Readiness Assessment
For most organisations a single cross-regulatory implementation is more effective than several parallel compliance projects.
CASP: alignment of CDD/EDD, TFR, screening and governance with MiCA licensing requirements.
ICT resilience for transaction monitoring and sanctions screening systems, together with BCP/DRP.
DPIA, legal basis for processing, 5-year retention and profiling rules in AML processes.
Classification of AI systems used in AML (TM/fraud/screening) and transparency requirements.
Cybersecurity and incident management for critical AML systems.
Updating AML breach reporting channels and whistleblower protection.
Stage outcome: Cross-Regulatory Alignment Matrix + Integrated DPIA (GDPR+AML) + AI in AML Assessment.
We tailor the scope of work to the organisation's stage: from quick diagnosis to full implementation and ongoing compliance maintenance.
For organisations starting an AMLR project that need to quickly determine scope and sequence of actions. You get a gap analysis, risk map and priority plan.
For companies that need a full Business-Wide Risk Assessment because the current risk assessment is outdated or too general. You get the methodology, a risk matrix and audit-ready documentation.
For entities that need to complete a full 0-9 stage implementation in a single project before the deadline. You get governance, procedures, monitoring, training and a maintenance model.
For crypto entities subject to MiCA and AMLR/TFR that want to avoid parallel, inconsistent implementations. You get integration of CDD/EDD, Travel Rule, sanctions and wallet compliance procedures.
For organisations with an active AML system but outdated procedures — where the main risk is the quality of onboarding and client review. You get new CDD, HNWI, UBO, PEP and sanctions flagging standards.
For companies that, after implementation, want to maintain compliance in a continuous model without losing it operationally. You get policy updates, change monitoring, audit support and board reporting.
As a first step we qualify the project stage: readiness diagnosis, full implementation or compliance maintenance and audit.